2V0-13.24 Latest Material Pass Certify| Valid 2V0-13.24 Real Question: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect

Blog Article

Tags: 2V0-13.24 Latest Material, 2V0-13.24 Real Question, Exam 2V0-13.24 Practice, Exam 2V0-13.24 Testking, 2V0-13.24 Dumps Discount

On the one hand, our company hired the top experts in each qualification examination field to write the 2V0-13.24 training materials, so as to ensure that our products have a very high quality, so that users can rest assured that the use of our research materials. On the other hand, under the guidance of high quality research materials, the rate of adoption of the 2V0-13.24 Study Materials preparation is up to 98% to 100%. Of course, it is necessary to qualify for a qualifying exam, but more importantly, you will have more opportunities to get promoted in the workplace.

Exams4Collection offers up-to-date VMware 2V0-13.24 practice material consisting of three formats that will prove to be vital for you. You can easily ace the VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect (2V0-13.24) exam on the first attempt if you prepare with this material. The VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Dumps have been made under the expert advice of 90,000 highly experienced VMware professionals from around the globe. They assure that anyone who prepares from it will get VMware 2V0-13.24 certified on the first attempt.

>> 2V0-13.24 Latest Material <<

2V0-13.24 Quiz Torrent - 2V0-13.24 Exam Guide & 2V0-13.24 Test Braindumps

The users of 2V0-13.24 exam dumps cover a wide range of fields, including professionals, students, and students of less advanced culture. This is because the language format of our study materials is easy to understand. No matter what information you choose to study, you don’t have to worry about being a beginner and not reading data. 2V0-13.24 Test Questions are prepared by many experts. The content is very rich, and there are many levels. Our study materials want every user to understand the product and be able to really get what they need.

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of cloud architects and infrastructure engineers and focuses on understanding the architecture of VMware by Broadcom solution. Candidates should be able to differentiate between various VMware Cloud Foundation architecture options based on different scenarios.
Topic 2	IT Architectures, Technologies, Standards: This section of the exam measures the skills of enterprise architects and solution architects and focuses on the fundamentals of IT architectures, technologies, and standards. It covers differentiating between business and technical requirements, understanding conceptual models, and logical and physical designs, and recognizing the distinctions between requirements, assumptions, constraints, and risks. Also included are availability, manageability, performance, recoverability, and security (AMPRS), developing risk mitigation strategies, documenting design decisions, and creating design validation strategies.
Topic 3	Troubleshoot and Optimize the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.
Topic 4	Plan and Design the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of VMware administrators. It involves gathering and analyzing business objectives and requirements to create a conceptual model. Additionally, it covers the creation of VMware Cloud Foundation logical and physical designs. This includes prerequisites and design decisions related to Network Infrastructure, VCF Management Domain, VCF Workload Domain, VCF Edge Cluster, VCF Cloud Automation, and VCF Cloud Operations. Designs should consider availability within and across availability zones, manageability (Lifecycle Management, Scalability, Capacity Management), performance, recoverability (BCDR strategies), and security for VCF Management Components and Workloads. Workload mobility, consumption, and monitoring strategies are also addressed in this section.
Topic 5	Install, Configure, and Administrate the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Sample Questions (Q103-Q108):

NEW QUESTION # 103
Which of the following is a key consideration when differentiating between availability, manageability, performance, recoverability, and security (AMPRS)?
Response:

A. Availability should be optimized, with security being a secondary concern.
B. Security is the most important and should be prioritized over all other factors.
C. Each factor is independent and should be handled separately.
D. These factors should be considered together as they impact system design and performance.

Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 104
A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design mandates that:
All availability zones must operate independently of each other.
The availability SLA must adhere to no less than 99.9%.
What would be the three design decisions that would help satisfy those requirements? (Choose three.)

A. Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s)
B. Configure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain
C. Choose two distant AZ(s) and consider each AZ the DR for the other
D. Choose two close proximity AZ(s) and configure a stretched management workload domain
E. Configure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ
F. Make sure the recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components has access to both AZ(s)

Answer: A,B,E

Explanation:
This scenario involves a VCF multi-AZ design where AZs must operate independently (no shared dependencies) and achieve a 99.9% availability SLA (allowing ~8.76 hours of downtime annually). The design decisions must ensure resilience, fault isolation, and recovery capabilities across AZs.
Requirement Analysis:
Independent AZ operation:Each AZ must function standalone, with no single point of failure or dependency across AZs.
99.9% availability:The design must minimize downtime through redundancy, replication, and recovery mechanisms.
Option Analysis:
A: Configure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain:Array- based replication (e.g., vSphere Replication or SAN replication) for the management domain (vCenter, NSX Manager, SDDC Manager) ensures that critical management VMs are duplicated across AZs. If one AZ fails, the other can take over with minimal downtime, supporting independent operation and high availability. The VCF 5.2 Design Guide recommends replication for multi-AZ deployments to meet SLAs, as it provides a recovery point objective (RPO) near zero. This option enhances availability and is correct.
B: Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s):Replicating configuration backups (e.g., SDDC Manager backups, NSX configurations) ensures that each AZ has access to recovery data. If an AZ's management components fail, the other AZ can restore operations independently using its local backup copy. This supports the independence requirement and reduces downtime (contributing to 99.9% SLA) by enabling quick recovery. The VCF Administration Guide emphasizes backup replication for multi-AZ resilience, making this option correct.
C: Make sure the recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components has access to both AZ (s):A recovery VLAN spanning both AZs implies a shared network dependency. If this VLAN fails (e.g., due to a network outage), both AZs could be impacted, violating the independence requirement. Multi-AZ designs in VCF favor isolated networks per AZ to avoid cross-AZ single points of failure. The VCF Design Guide advises against shared VLANs for critical components in independent AZ setups. This option undermines the requirements and is incorrect.
D: Choose two distant AZ(s) and consider each AZ the DR for the other:Distant AZs (e.g., separate data centers) with mutual DR (disaster recovery) roles enhance geographic fault tolerance. However, "operate independently" in VCF typically means each AZ can run workloads standalone, not that one is a passive DR site. Distant AZs introduce latency, complicating synchronous replication needed for 99.9% availability, and may rely on shared management, conflicting with independence. The VCF Multi-AZ Guide focuses on active- active AZs, not DR-centric designs, making this less suitable.
E: Choose two close proximity AZ(s) and configure a stretched management workload domain:A stretched management domain (e.g., using vSAN stretched cluster) spans AZs with synchronous replication, ensuring high availability. However, this creates a dependency: both AZs share the same vCenter and management stack, so a failure (e.g., vCenter outage) could affect both, violating independence. The VCF 5.2 Design Guide notes stretched clusters are for single logical domains, not independent AZs. This option contradicts the requirement and is incorrect.
F: Configure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ:A non-routable, AZ-specific recovery VLAN isolates management recovery traffic (e.g., for vMotion, backups) within each AZ. This ensures that each AZ's management components operate independently, with no cross-AZ network reliance. If one AZ's network fails, the other remains unaffected, supporting the SLA through fault isolation. The VCF Multi-AZ Design Guide recommends separate, isolated networks per AZ for resilience, making this option correct.
Conclusion:The three design decisions areConfigure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain (A),Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s) (B), andConfigure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ (F). These ensure independent operation and meet the 99.9% SLA through replication and isolation.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (Section: Multi-AZ Design)
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (Section: Backup and Recovery) VMware Cloud Foundation Multi-AZ Deployment Guide (Section: Networking) VMware vSphere 8.0 Update 3 Documentation (Section: vSAN Stretched Clusters)

NEW QUESTION # 105
An architect is updating a design document in preparation for an expansion of their organization's existing VCF environment. Following the completion of a capacity assessment, a new cluster will be deployed to support the hosting of future application deployments. Due to restrictions on the availability of budget for the project, the hardware for the additional cluster has already been procured and there is no additional budget available for future procurements. What should the architect include within the design documentation based on this approach?

A. A constraint that the procured hardware must be used due to budget restrictions.
B. A risk that additional hardware is not available for purchase.
C. A requirement that the cluster must be deployed within the existing workload domain.
D. An assumption that the new cluster will provide sufficient capacity for the applications.

Answer: A

Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) design documentation, architects must adhere to VMware's recommended design methodology, which includes identifying constraints, risks, requirements, and assumptions. These elements ensure the design aligns with the project's scope and limitations. Let's evaluate each option based on the scenario:
Option A: A constraint that the procured hardware must be used due to budget restrictionsA constraint is a limitation or restriction that impacts the design. The scenario explicitly states that hardware has already been procured and no additional budget is available for future procurements. This directly imposes a design constraint: the architect must use the existing, procured hardware for the new cluster. Including this in the design documentation ensures clarity that no alternative hardware options can be considered, aligning with VMware'sVCF 5.2 Architectural Guiderecommendation to document budgetary and resource constraints explicitly in the design process.
Option B: A risk that additional hardware is not available for purchaseA risk represents a potential issue that could impact the project's success. While the lack of budget for future procurements is a fact, it's not framed as a risk (an uncertain event) but as a known limitation. A risk might be "insufficient capacity in the procured hardware," but the statement here focuses on the unavailability of additional purchases, which is already certain due to the budget constraint. Thus, this is better captured as a constraint (A) rather than a risk, per VMware's design methodology.
Option C: A requirement that the cluster must be deployed within the existing workload domainA requirement defines what must be achieved. The scenario doesn't specify that the new cluster must be part of an existing workload domain (a logical grouping of clusters in VCF). It only mentions deployment for future applications, leaving flexibility to create a new workload domain or expand an existing one. Without explicit customer or technical mandates tying the cluster to an existing domain, this isn't a justified inclusion.
Option D: An assumption that the new cluster will provide sufficient capacity for the applicationsAn assumption is a statement taken as true without proof, pending validation. While the capacity assessment suggests the cluster is intended to support future applications, stating it "will provide sufficient capacity" assumes a conclusion not yet verified. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guideadvises against assumptions about capacity unless validated, recommending instead that capacity risks or constraints be documented if uncertain.
Here, the constraint (A) takes precedence over an unverified assumption.
Conclusion:Option A is the most appropriate inclusion because it directly reflects the scenario's budgetary limitation as a design constraint, ensuring the architect's decision to use the procured hardware is documented clearly and aligns with VCF design best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Section on Design Methodology (Constraints, Risks, Requirements, Assumptions).
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): Cluster Deployment Considerations.

NEW QUESTION # 106
During a requirements gathering workshop, several Business and Technical requirements were captured from the customer. Which requirement will be classified as a Business Requirement?

A. The system must support 10,000 concurrent users.
B. The application must be compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems.
C. Data must be encrypted using AES-256 encryption.
D. Reduce processing time for service requests by 30%.

Answer: D

Explanation:
In VMware's design methodology (aligned with VCF 5.2), requirements are categorized asBusiness Requirements(goals tied to organizational outcomes, often non-technical) orTechnical Requirements (specific system capabilities or constraints). Let's classify each option:
Option A: Reduce processing time for service requests by 30%This is a Business Requirement. It focuses on a business outcome-improving service request efficiency by a measurable percentage-without specifying how the system achieves it. TheVMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guideclassifies such high-level, outcome-driven goals as business requirements, as they reflect the customer's operational or strategic priorities rather than technical implementation details.
Option B: The system must support 10,000 concurrent usersThis is a Technical Requirement. It specifies a measurable system capability (supporting 10,000 concurrent users), directly tied to performance and capacity. VMware documentation treats such quantifiable system behaviors as technical, focusing on "what" the system must do functionally.
Option C: Data must be encrypted using AES-256 encryptionThis is a Technical Requirement. It mandates a specific technical implementation (AES-256 encryption) for security, a non-functional attribute.
TheVCF 5.2 Design Guidecategorizes encryption standards as technical constraints or requirements, not business goals.
Option D: The application must be compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems This is a Technical Requirement. It defines a functional capability-cross-platform compatibility-specifying technical details about the system's operation. VMware classifies such compatibility needs as technical, per the design methodology.
Conclusion:Option A is the Business Requirement, as it aligns with a business goal (efficiency improvement) rather than a technical specification.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Section on Requirements Gathering and Classification.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide(docs.vmware.com): Business vs. Technical Requirements.

NEW QUESTION # 107
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer.
During the requirements gathering workshop, the customer provided the following requirement:
All SSL certificates should be provided by the company's certificate authority.
When creating the design, how should the architect classify this stated requirement?

A. Security
B. Recoverability
C. Manageability
D. Availability

Answer: A

Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, requirements are classified using design qualities as defined in VMware's architectural methodology: Availability, Manageability, Performance, Recoverability, and Security. These qualities help architects align customer needs with technical solutions. The requirement specifies that "all SSL certificates should be provided by the company's certificate authority," which involves encryption, identity verification, and trust management. Let's classify it:
Option A: RecoverabilityRecoverability focuses on restoring services after failures, such as disaster recovery (DR) or failover (e.g., RTO, RPO). SSL certificates relate to securing communication, not recovery processes. TheVMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guidedefines Recoverability as pertaining to system restoration, not certificate management, making this incorrect.
Option B: SecuritySecurity encompasses protecting the system from threats, ensuring data confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity. Requiring SSL certificates from the company's certificate authority (CA) directly relates to securing VCF components (e.g., vCenter, NSX, SDDC Manager) by enforcing trusted, organization- specific encryption and authentication. TheVMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guideclassifies certificate usage under Security, as it mitigates risks like man-in-the-middle attacks and aligns with compliance standards (e.g., PCI-DSS, if applicable). This is the correct classification.
Option C: AvailabilityAvailability ensures system uptime and fault tolerance (e.g., HA, redundancy). While SSL certificates enable secure access, they don't directly influence uptime or failover. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guideties Availability to resilience mechanisms (e.g., clustered deployments), not security controls like certificates.
Option D: ManageabilityManageability focuses on operational ease (e.g., monitoring, automation). Using a company CA involves certificate deployment and renewal, which could relate to management processes.
However, the primary intent is securing communication, not simplifying administration. VMware documentation distinguishes certificate-related requirements as Security, not Manageability, unless explicitly about operational workflows.
Conclusion:The requirement is best classified asSecurity (B), as it addresses the secure configuration of SSL certificates, a core security concern in VCF 5.2.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Section on Design Qualities (Security, Recoverability, etc.).
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide(docs.vmware.com): Certificate Management and Security Classification.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): SSL Certificate Configuration.

NEW QUESTION # 108
......

If you are going to prepare for the 2V0-13.24 exam in order to get the related certification and improve yourself, you are bound to be very luck. With the joint efforts of all parties, our company has designed the very convenient and useful 2V0-13.24 study materials. More importantly, the practices have proven that the study materials from our company have helped a lot of people achieve their goal and get the related certification. The 2V0-13.24 Study Materials of our company is the study tool which best suits these people who long to pass the 2V0-13.24 exam and get the related certification.

2V0-13.24 Real Question: https://www.exams4collection.com/2V0-13.24-latest-braindumps.html

Report this page

2V0-13.24 LATEST MATERIAL PASS CERTIFY| VALID 2V0-13.24 REAL QUESTION: VMWARE CLOUD FOUNDATION 5.2 ARCHITECT

2V0-13.24 Latest Material Pass Certify| Valid 2V0-13.24 Real Question: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect